The Old Times

Established 1967

Nick Gellatly

Adjusting the Ariel: Watching My Beautiful Laundrette

Image: A scene from My Beautiful Laundrette via Google

This week I began developing ideas for an opening title sequence for Stephen Frears’ My Beautiful Laundrette (1985), written by Hanif Kureishi. Before getting too carried away with washing machines, bubbles, neon and typography, I decided that I needed to understand what the film was actually saying – particularly as I haven’t watched the film for a while.

I could make a visually attractive sequence based on the superficial story: two young men renovate a run-down South London laundrette and fall in love. That’s the part of the story I remembered. But if the titles are going to be genuinely relevant to the film, I need to get into the weeds of it: its subtext, contradictions, symbolism and historical context.

Image: ‘Into the Weeds’

That seems particularly important with this film because the BFI describes it as addressing sexuality and racism in Thatcherite Britain, while Criterion characterises it as a work of social realism concerned with racism, homophobia and socio-political marginalisation. BFI Southbank

So, on this viewing, I tried to look beyond what happens and ask what it might mean.

Two very different versions of success

Image: ‘Both sides of the coin’

Omar (Gordon Warnecke) begins in the shadow of his father, Papa (Roshan Seth), an intellectual and committed socialist who has become depressed and dependent on alcohol. Papa’s room feels almost static. His ideals have not translated into a satisfying life in the Britain in which he now finds himself.

His brother Nasser (Saeed Jaffrey) represents almost the opposite response. He has embraced property, business, money and entrepreneurialism. The BFI specifically identifies the film’s engagement with the entrepreneurial ethos of the 1980s alongside its racial tensions. BFI

Omar therefore seems caught between two possibilities:

Papa: intellect, socialism, principle but disappointment and withdrawal.
Nasser: enterprise, property and money but compromise and questionable morality.

Neither offers a simple answer.

This helped me understand why Omar’s desire to make something of the laundrette matters. He is not merely redecorating a shop. He is trying to construct his own version of a future.

Money is never quite clean

Image: ‘Money Laundrette’

That becomes more complicated through Salim (Derrick Branche). His modern Indian art, fashionable home and apparent sophistication resist an easy stereotype of what an Asian character in a British film should look like.

But Salim’s world also introduces violence and drugs.

This made me notice one of Kureishi’s cleverest ideas: in a film about washing and cleanliness, the money itself isn’t necessarily clean.

The film was made during a period when entrepreneurship and individual economic advancement were strongly associated with Thatcherite Britain. The BFI places My Beautiful Laundrette explicitly within that context of Thatcherism, opportunity and its absence. BFI

Omar wants to succeed, and he is prepared to enter a morally ambiguous economic world to do it.

That gives the laundrette another possible meaning for my titles: what exactly is being washed, and what cannot be washed clean?

Omar and Johnny: refusing simple categories

Image: ‘It’s complicated’

Then there is Johnny (Daniel Day-Lewis).

He is white, working-class and associated with racist skinhead culture. Omar has previously seen him participating in a National Front march. Yet when they encounter one another again, Omar reaches towards him rather than simply treating him as an enemy.

Their previous intimacy gradually re-emerges.

This makes the relationship much more challenging than a straightforward romantic narrative. Johnny has participated in a culture that threatens people like Omar. Love doesn’t magically remove that history.

Instead, Johnny’s development is demonstrated through the choices he subsequently makes.

The BFI describes Omar and Johnny as former school friends separated by Johnny’s involvement with the National Front, whose relationship is renewed while they establish the laundrette. BFI

That gives me another potentially useful theme:

Can somebody change without erasing what they were?

Again, that feels particularly potent in a film about washing.

The laundrette as transformation

Image: ‘Spin cycle’

When Omar is given responsibility for the neglected laundrette, he wants to make the place good. He brings Johnny into the project and offers him work.

Together they take something that is:

dirty → neglected → broken → ordinary

and make it:

bright → modern → desirable → beautiful.

Suddenly the title My Beautiful Laundrette seems much less throwaway.

The laundrette becomes both a commercial enterprise and a space that Omar and Johnny can make for themselves.

Outside it they are continually categorised: Pakistani, white, immigrant family, working-class, skinhead, gay, respectable, disreputable.

Inside, something different becomes possible.

This is especially striking because their sexual relationship isn’t presented as a separate “gay issue” bolted onto a story about race. Race, sexuality, money, family and class continually intersect. The BFI has described the film as a cultural landmark in its representation of South Asian British experience, while its queer relationship has also secured its place within British LGBTQ+ cinema. BFI

Public and private

Image: ‘Seen and unseen’

I was particularly interested in the glass of the laundrette.

It creates a boundary between what is publicly visible and what remains private.

Omar and Johnny can be businessmen on one side of that boundary and lovers on the other. Respectability and desire can occupy almost exactly the same physical space.

That gives me something potentially much more interesting for motion graphics than simply putting credits over pictures of washing machines:

glass, reflections, transparency, concealment, glimpses and things happening just beyond what we can clearly see.

Everybody is performing something

Image: ‘Performance’

The more closely I watched, the less interested the film seemed in giving us morally tidy characters.

Nasser presents one version of respectable family and business life while maintaining his relationship with Rachel. Omar is expected to move towards a conventional heterosexual future with Tania, although neither Omar nor Tania comfortably fits the future being imagined for them.

Johnny’s aggressive white masculinity conceals another identity.

Omar’s entrepreneurial confidence conceals his sexuality.

Salim’s sophistication conceals criminality.

Papa’s intellectual authority conceals despair.

Everyone seems to have a public version and a private version.

That feels enormously useful when thinking about an opening title sequence.

Video: ‘Performance, Camera, Action’

Johnny cannot simply wash away his past

Image: ‘Evolution’

Johnny’s former associates eventually return, and the tensions around racism, belonging and violence erupt.

What interests me is that Johnny’s transformation is not demonstrated by saying that he is no longer racist. It is demonstrated by what he does.

Earlier in the story he has been associated with racist violence. Later he places himself in its path.

His past has not disappeared. His behaviour has changed.

Perhaps transformation in My Beautiful Laundrette therefore isn’t about becoming completely clean. It is about deciding what you do next.

And then there is water

Image: ‘H2O’

The ending made me reconsider one of the visual ideas I had already been developing.

After the violence, Omar cares for the injured Johnny. Eventually the two men splash water at one another.

Throughout the film, water has principally belonged to the laundrette:

water as washing
water as labour
water as business
water as money.

But here it becomes:

water as play
water as intimacy
water as tenderness.

The film doesn’t need a grand declaration of love. It finishes with these two men playing together.

What this means for my title sequence

Image: ‘After Effects’

This deeper viewing has changed the way I think about the motion-graphics project.

My initial surrealist experiments already involved a washing machine gradually becoming impossible: South London appearing inside its drum, water escaping onto the floor, bubbles filling the room and laundry eventually floating upwards.

I now realise that those images can carry considerably more meaning.

The washing machine can become Britain itself: race, sexuality, class, capitalism, immigration and identity tumbling together.

The glass can represent the division between public and private selves.

The red, white and blue washing can question Britishness and who is permitted to belong.

The dirty/clean motif can connect with money, racism, Johnny’s past and the impossibility of simply washing history away.

And the overflowing water can become something more than a surreal visual effect.

It might represent everything that these characters spend the film trying to contain:

desire, memory, race, violence, money, shame, identity and love.

Eventually, it cannot remain inside the machine.

That is the level I want the opening titles to work at. I don’t want them simply to tell an audience, this film contains a laundrette. The imagery should begin planting questions that the film itself will explore.

Perhaps getting into the weeds before opening After Effects is therefore part of the motion-design process too.

About the artwork

For this series I took inspiration from the modern Indian art seen in Salim’s flat, using bold colour, flattened perspective, geometric forms and painterly textures to explore the film rather than simply illustrate scenes from it. The images translate my analysis into visual motifs: washing and water suggest transformation; glass and reflections explore public and private identities; money and stains question the morality of enterprise; and fractured forms reflect tensions around race, sexuality, class and belonging. This became another experiment in my creative process using visual research to ensure that the imagery in my eventual title sequence grows from the film’s deeper meanings. The images were co-created with Google Gemini.


References

British Film Institute (BFI) (2021) ‘10 great British films about romance across social divides’. BFI. Available at: BFI – romance across social divides (Accessed: 29 September 2026).

British Film Institute (BFI) (2022) ‘10 great films about South Asian Britain’. BFI. Available at: BFI – South Asian Britain (Accessed: 29 September 2026).

British Film Institute (BFI) (2025) ‘40 years of My Beautiful Laundrette: how the London locations look today’. BFI, 8 August. Available at: BFI – 40 years of My Beautiful Laundrette (Accessed: 29 September 2026).

Criterion Collection (2015) My Beautiful Laundrette. Available at: Criterion Collection – My Beautiful Laundrette (Accessed: 29 September 2026).

Frears, S. (dir.) (1985) My Beautiful Laundrette. Screenplay by Hanif Kureishi. UK: Working Title Films/Channel Four Films.

Posted in , ,

One response to “Motion Graphics: Week 2 (Part 1)”

  1. […] Motion Graphics: Week 2 (Part 1) […]

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Old Times

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading