Nick Gellatly
From v3 to v4 in ten steps
Version three of the My Beautiful Laundrette title sequence went up at the end of week six with its sound on, and I thought it was finished. James watched it in the session and gave me nine notes which I think had improved it a lot – take a look to see if you agree.
1. The note under all the other notes
Nine notes looked like nine jobs: rain in the wet street, a glowing light somewhere, more bubble animation and “bottom of the scene is it masking? Feather the mask?”, something on the music beat, Omar and Johnny “coming together in spite of all that is keeping them apart”, livelier laundry on the Frears frame, longer holds at the end, Thatcher’s Britain, and whether the whole thing should be longer.
Underneath them was one question, “is it simply a case of improving the animation by ‘sweating the asset’ (a phrase I often heard in my working life) of After Effects so that we push it to deliver the best possible job for me here?”
Mostly, yes. Seven of the nine turned out to be scripting rather than new artwork.
2. Going to 120 seconds
The brief caps at 120, not 90, so I took all of it. At 96 BPM a beat is 15 frames and a bar is 60, which makes 120 seconds exactly 48 bars and 2,880 frames (thank you Claude for calculating that!). Nothing had to be re-timed, every frame starts on a bar line, and the extra thirty seconds went where James asked: the neon title holds for seventeen seconds instead of five, and there is room at the end to stop rather than just finish.
3. Rain, and the first mistake of the week
Two layers of CC Rainfall, one small and slow behind, one large and fast in front, because the difference in speed is what reads as depth rather than texture. They went inside the 900×900 street insert rather than the frame holding it, so the porthole crops the rain.
Then I ran it and the street vanished behind a black rectangle. CC Rainfall draws onto the layer it sits on, and I had sat it on a black solid in Normal mode, so I was looking at a black solid, faithfully rendered, with rain on it. Screen mode fixed it.
4. The hard edge round the bubbles
James’s most precise note, and he was right. The bubbles sat in a hard-edged teal basin that read as a sticker laid on the drum.
The fix is a feathered mask, and the interesting part is placing it, because mask coordinates live in the layer’s own space rather than the composition’s. So the script runs twice. The first pass draws red where the mask edge will go and blue where the feather fades out to, and changes nothing else.
The red line sat too high and clipped the lower bubbles, so the centre came down and both circles grew.
After. The basin is gone and the foam dissolves into the facets instead of sitting on them.
I used that calibrate-then-commit pattern three more times this week. It is the most useful habit I have picked up this module: when you cannot see the result, make the software show you its intention before it acts.
5. Making the bubbles spin
Once the edge was soft I asked whether the bubbles could turn, since the ring around them already does.
Yes, but masks rotate with the layer they sit on, so spinning the foam would swing that soft edge round the frame like a searchlight. The fix was to move the feather up a level, onto the layer holding the foam in the frame above, so the foam turns inside its own composition while the edge stays put. Sixty-two degrees across ten seconds, pivoting on the middle of the bubbles, with a breath of scale under two percent so it churns rather than revolves.
6. Omar and Johnny
The note worth building the iteration around, and the one I got wrong first. I had planned two travelling circles of light. Then I looked properly at the artwork and found it already answers the question. Omar is in warm oranges, Johnny in cool teals, neither is looking at the other, and the ribbon field between them is made of the same faceted language the two men are made of. They are not standing in front of a fragmented background. They are partly made of it.
So they drift toward each other across the fifteen seconds, closing from 630 pixels to 446, while the ribbons hold for the first third and then recede, so what is between them thins rather than being swept away. A warm light grows in the gap.
They never touch and they never turn to look. The film does not resolve either.
7. The folded laundry, which is also the politics
Kureishi’s frame held a painting of six folded towels and nothing else. One image, one transform, nothing to animate.
So I duplicated the painting six times and masked each copy down to a single towel. This works only because of how it was painted: every towel is separated by a heavy navy outline, so a cut landing anywhere in the dark is invisible.
Blue for the top and bottom of the stack, red for the cuts between towels.
The bottom towel lands first and the rest stack upward, one per beat, each falling tilted and settling back. That is the “something on the beat” note, answered where it does the most work.
And the third towel from the top does not lie flat. It tries again at six and a half seconds and still does not manage it. That is Omar’s father, the one who will not go through the cycle and come out sorted. Nobody has to notice. It is the only moment where the machine’s argument fails, and it cost twenty lines of script.
A stack that assembles perfectly is a graphic. A stack with one towel askew is a launderette.
8. Frame 12 was a photograph
The door opened at 2.2 seconds, the washing landed at 3.3, and then there were twelve seconds of a still image with Stephen Frears’s name on it.
The first round of fixes added small internal movements: the door creeping, the washing sagging nine pixels, the light still growing. Not enough, and the reason is worth writing down. Nothing in the frame was moving as a whole. The eye reads a frame as still within about two seconds and stops looking, however much is quietly happening inside it. The fix was not more events, it was a camera.
The frame now grows eight percent across its length, a drift rather than a zoom. The type is left out, so the names stay still and stay sharp while the room grows around them. I’m not certain I am quite finished with this frame but I need to watch it a few more times as I am currently uncertain what (or if) it needs more.
9. The end of the thing
The join to the end card was three jolts in one second: the pictures stopping dead, half a second of black while the music carried on, then navy appearing at full strength. Every other cut in the sequence is a hard cut and they all work, because a hard cut from one picture to another is a cut. A hard cut from a picture to nothing is a dropped frame.
The obvious fix is a crossfade, and the obvious fix is wrong: two layers dissolving past each other both pass through fifty percent, and two half-transparent navies composite to about seventy-five percent brightness. The background would dip, and the navy is the only thing the eye has to hold onto across that join.
So the card starts at 120 underneath frame 12 at full opacity with no type showing, and frame 12 dissolves away over it. The navy never changes strength. What you see is the launderette fading out of a darkness that was already there.
10. Thatcher’s Britain was already in there
James’s hardest question was how to better capture the narrative, and I had a list of ideas, all of which involved making something new.
Then a script that surveys every layer in the project, written to chase an entirely different problem, printed the contents of F04_Porthole: newspaper, whisky, flag, notes, blockprint, terraces, all rotating in the drum. The father’s journalism, his drinking, the terraces. The work is not to build anything, it is to let people see what is already on screen. That is next week as I think about how to do that.
How it got made
Nine ExtendScript files this week, written with Claude across two long sessions, which I say plainly. The creative calls are mine. The crooked towel is mine.
What it cost, and what is next
Nothing, this week. Not a penny. Every change above is After Effects doing what it already does, which is precisely where James was pushing me.
Next: the porthole, to make Thatcher’s Britain legible rather than merely present, and the storyboard and process form brought up to date. Also two sage towels have transparent holes where the background removal cut through, which nobody could see while they were still and everybody will see now they move.
Before then, another opportunity to see the latest version:
Leave a Reply